Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1995-05-01 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1995-05-01 House Journal Page 1704 HB 202 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 202 "An Act relating to the participation and accountability of parents and guardians and the enforcement of restitution orders entered in juvenile delinquency proceedings; relating to claims on permanent fund dividends for certain court-ordered treatment in juvenile delinquency proceedings; changing Alaska Supreme Court Delinquency Rules 3(b) and 8(b); and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page HES RPT CS(HES) NT 3DP 2NR 1005 5 ZERO FNS (3-HES, 2-ADM) 2/27/95 1005 2 ZERO FNS (REV, LAW) 2/27/95 1005 JUD RPT CS(HES) NT 5DP 1280 FISCAL NOTE (COURT) 1281 2 ZERO FISCAL NOTES (REV, LAW) 2/27/95 1281 5 ZERO FNS (3-HES, 2-ADM) 2/27/95 1281 FIN RPT CS(HES) NT 10 DP 1444 FISCAL NOTE (COURT) 4/12/95 1445 5 ZERO FNS (2-ADM, 3-HES) 2/27/95 1445 2 ZERO FNS (REV, LAW) 2/27/95 1445 Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 202(HES) "An Act relating to the participation and accountability of parents and guardians and the enforcement of restitution orders entered in juvenile delinquency proceedings; relating to claims on permanent fund dividends for certain court-ordered treatment in juvenile delinquency proceedings; and amending Alaska Delinquency Rules 3(b) and 8(b); and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. 1995-05-01 House Journal Page 1705 HB 202 Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB202(HES) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 202(HES) was read the third time. Representative Robinson placed a call of the House. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB202(HES) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. Representative Vezey objected. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall CSHB202(HES) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 202(HES) Third Reading Return to Second for Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams And so, the motion failed. The question being: "Shall CSHB 202(HES) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-05-01 House Journal Page 1706 HB 202 CSHB 202(HES) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 38 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brown, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Brice, Davies And so, CSHB 202(HES) passed the House. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Davies gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB202(HES).